PSYC14050 - Ethics & Professional Issues in Psychology
Term 1 - 2017


All details in this unit profile for PSYC14050 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student). The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.

Overview

This unit will provide you with comprehensive training in Research Ethics and the Ethics of Professional Practice. This unit will develop and assess your ability to apply ethics concepts in real life situations and scenarios, with emphasis placed on the provision of evidence based reasoning and justifications. As an advanced level unit there is a high level of expectation regarding independent study and self-directed learning. You are expected to be an active participant in the learning process, to independently research and read widely and to reflect upon multiple perspectives and opinions about best ethics practice in psychology - both in research and in professional practice. The unit is split into two six-week modules. Module 1 - Research Ethics will provide you with an understanding of the necessity for, and the processes which underpin research ethics within the Psychology discipline. This module has a focus on and will acquaint you with, the human research ethics procedures set by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Module 2 - Professional Practice aims to equip you with the knowledge necessary for practicing as a psychologist in a professional manner. The focus of this module is on the identification of ethical issues in practice, and the development of professional decision making skills. This module will acquaint you with the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Guidelines set by the Australian Psychological Society.

Details

Career Level Undergraduate
Unit Level Level 4
Credit Points 6
Student Contribution Band 1
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.125

Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Academic Course = CC42

Residential Schools

This unit has a Compulsory Residential School for distance mode students and the details are:
Click here to see your Residential School Timetable.

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Offerings

Term 1 - 2017
  • Mixed Mode

Website

This unit has a website, within the Moodle system, which is available two weeks before the start of term. It is important that you visit your Moodle site throughout the term. Go to Moodle

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Undergraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Assessment Overview

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Group Work 15%
2. Written Assessment 20%
3. Practical Assessment 15%
4. Written Assessment 20%
5. Examination 30%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Procedures for more details of interim results and final grades.

All University policies are available on the IMPortal.

You may wish to view these policies:

  • Grades and Results Procedure
  • Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
  • Review of Grade Procedure
  • Academic Misconduct Procedure
  • Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
  • Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
  • Refund and Excess Payments (Credit Balances) Policy and Procedure
  • Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
  • Acceptable Use of Information and Communications Technology Facilities and Devices Policy and Procedure

This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the IMPortal.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback Source Recommendation
Too many assessment tasks that required a tremendous amount of work for correspondingly small percentage of marks. Student feedback Currently there are five assessment tasks. Two of the assessment tasks have two parts - a total of seven items. It is recommended that the number of assessment items be reviewed.
I believe the assessment criteria/matrices used, need to be much more comprehensive so we can specifically identify were marks were lost - I found the use of these very generic. Student feedback Develop assessment rubrics which provide more detailed feedback to students.
The only area of improvement could be the way res school was structured.... I would have loved less time watching other people's talks in order to have some more face to face learning or discussion time. Student feedback Consider re-structuring the residential school to provide for more teamwork interaction during the day.
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Identify and apply the ethical requirements of psychological research in an Australian context, particularly as they relate to the National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Human Research.
  2. Critically evaluate research from an ethics perspective and propose changes to a research approach and/or design to address the ethical issues identified.
  3. Apply and evaluate ethical decision making strategies across multiple professional contexts, particularly as they relate to applications of the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Gudelines of the Australian Psychological Society.

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1 - Group Work  
2 - Written Assessment  
3 - Practical Assessment    
4 - Written Assessment  
5 - Examination  

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

  • Introductory Level
  • Intermediate Level
  • Graduate Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3
1. Communication
2. Problem Solving
3. Critical Thinking
4. Information Literacy
5. Team Work
6. Information Technology Competence      
7. Cross Cultural Competence      
8. Ethical practice

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

  • Introductory Level
  • Intermediate Level
  • Graduate Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Group Work
2 - Written Assessment  
3 - Practical Assessment
4 - Written Assessment  
5 - Examination      

Prescribed Textbooks

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
Author/s: American Psychologcial Association Year: 2009
Edition: 6th Publisher: Footprint Books
City: Sydney State: New South Wales
Country: Australia
Ethical Practice in Applied Psychology
Author/s: Christopher Boyle and Nicholas Gamble Year: 2014
Edition: Publisher: Oxford University Press Australia & New Zealand
City: South Melbourne State: Victoria
Country: Australia
APS Code of Ethics
Author/s: Australian Psychologcial Society Year: N/A
Edition: N/A Publisher: Australian Psychological Society
City: Melbourne State: Victoria
Country: Australia
APS Ethical Guidelines
Author/s: Australian Psychological Society Year: Latest - most currently available
Edition: N/A Publisher: Australian Psychological Society
City: Melbourne State: Victoria
Country: Australia
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research
Author/s: National Health and Medical Research Council Year: 2007
Edition: N/A Publisher: Australian Government
Country: Australia
View textbooks at the CQUniversity Bookshop
Note:

The Text book by Boyle and Gamble will be available through the university bookshop. The APS Code of Ethics and Ethical Guidelines are available through the APS, and/or also a version will be available on the Moodle site under resources.

The National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research is available on the NHMRC website.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Internet
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
  • Word processing sofware (Microsoft Word)
  • Presentation software (Microsoft PowerPoint)
All submissions for this unit must use the American Psychological Association (APA) referencing style (details can be obtained here). For further information, see the Assessment Tasks below.
Unit CoordinatorBradley Smith - smithpb (b.p.smith@cqu.edu.au)
Note: Check the Term-Specific section for any additional contact information provided by the teaching team
Week Begin Date Module/Topic Chapter Events and Submissions
Week 1 06-03-2017

Research Ethics

  • Introduction to research ethics.
  • Why is ethics important in research?
  • History of research ethics

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble, Chapter 9

Moodle resource links:

  • Helsinki Declaration
  • The Nuremberg Code
  • NHMRC - Summary of national statement on ethical conduct in human research
Week 2 13-03-2017

Research Ethics

  • The conduct of ethical research.
  • Research ethics at CQU

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble, Chapter 9
  • NHMRC (2007). National statement on ethcial conduct in human research - Preamble, purpose, scope and limits

Moodle resource links:

  • Standford prison experiment documents

Groups will be assigned by the end of this week for Assessment 1

Week 3 20-03-2017

Research Ethics

  • Key concepts in research ethics.

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble, Chapter 9
  • NHMRC (2007). National statement on ethcial conduct in human research - Sections 1 and 2

Moodle resource links:

  • Informed consent examples1 & 2
  • WHO informed consent
Week 4 27-03-2017

Research Ethics

  • Research with specific populations

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble, Chapter 9
  • NHMRC (2007) National statement on ethcial conduct in human research - Section 4

Moodle resource links:

  • Office for Human Research Protections (2010) Working with vulnerable populations.
  • NHMRC - Values and ethics: Guidelines for ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island Health Research.
  • NHMRC - Keeping research on track – A guide for aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
  • Aldridge (2014). Working with vulnerable groups
  • Witham, Beddow & Haigh (2015) … too vulnerable to research

Week 5 03-04-2017

Residential School - CQU Brisbane

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble - Chapters 1 and 3

Moodle resource links:

  • APS Code of Ethics
Group Presentation (Research Ethics) Due Tuesday (04 Apr 17) 12:00 PM AEST
Practical Assessment (Professional Ethics) Due Wednesday (05 Apr 17) 12:00 PM AEST
Vacation Week 10-04-2017
Week 6 17-04-2017

Professional Practice Ethics

  • Ethics in the practice of psychology (ethics, advertising, legal issues)

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble - Chapter 2

Moodle resource links:

  • Youngstrom & Busch (2000). Expert testimony in psychology.
  • Symons (2014) What's in a name?
  • Morrissey & Reddy (2006). Eight core competencies for ethical practice.
Written Assessment 1 (Research Ethics) Due Tuesday (18 Apr 17) 05:00 PM AEST
Week 7 24-04-2017

Professional Practice Ethics

  • Privacy and Consent

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble - Chapter 2 & 5

Moodle resource links:

  • Goesling, Potts & Handelsman (2000). Perceptions of confidentiality violations among psychologists.
  • Reamer (2013). Social work in a digital age: ethical and risk management challenges.
  • Sanci, Sawyer, Kang, Haller & Patton (2005). Confidential health care for adolescents.
Week 8 01-05-2017

Professional Practice Ethics

  • Managing boundaries and dual relationships.

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble - Chapter 4

Moodle resource links:

  • Faulkner & Faulkner (1997). Managing multiple relationships in rural communities.
  • Roufeil & Battye (2007). Psychology services in rural and remote Australia.
Week 9 08-05-2017

Professional Practice Ethics

  • Managing risky clients

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble - Chapters 7 & 8

Moodle resource links:

  • Australian Psychological Society.

    Suicide prevention tools.

  • Day (2013). Responding to serious antisocial behaviour.
  • Hawgood & De Leo (2015). Working with suicidal clients.
Written Assessment (Professional Ethics) Due Friday (12 May 17) 05:00 PM AEST
Week 10 15-05-2017

Professional Practice Ethics

  • Ethics in working with diverse client groups

Text readings:

  • Boyle & Gamble - Chapter 5

Moodle resource links:

  • Malone (2012). Ethical professional practice: exploring the issues for health services to rural Aboriginal communities.
  • Symons (2009). Legal and ethical aspects of working with young people.
Week 11 22-05-2017

Animal ethics

  • Using animals in research
  • The 3 R's

Moodle resource links:

Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes 8th edition (2013)

Week 12 29-05-2017

Review of Ethics

  • Summary and revision

No readings for this week

Review/Exam Week 05-06-2017

Revision week

Exam Week

Exam Week 12-06-2017

Exam Week

1 Group Work

Assessment Title Group Presentation (Research Ethics)
Task Description

Group presentation which critiques a research ethics application (15%).

The presentation (PowerPoint Slides, etc) will be presented at Residential School, CQUniversity Campus in Brisbane Week 5.

Groups will be assigned at the end of Week 2.

Your goal is to conduct an ethical critique of a research ethics application, and develop a presentation based on the aspects you consider need addressing by the researcher.

Your critique should focus on requirements according to the NHMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, with a particular focus on Sections 1 and 2, and Section 4 where required.

  • Focus on issues such as the clarity of the research question, identification of risk and participant confidentiality.
  • Provide some solutions to the problems identified – what would need to be changed to ensure the project meets the required ethical standards?

Use the following approach:

  • Identify and explain the problem (with reference to the NHMRC guidelines and other appropriate empirical sources)
  • What alternatives are there to the proposed approach and how might these lead to better ethical conduct of this specific research project (again with reference to both the NHRMC guidelines and the provision of other empirical evidence to justify your assertions and propositions)
  • Your group should develop a PowerPoint presentation that explains and addresses at least three (3) of the issues your group identifies.
  • Each group will have a 12 minute block allocated at the Residential School to present their critique and solutions, and each group member should participate fully in the development of the presentation as well as the presentation itself.
  • It is expected that your PowerPoint slides will provide an outline and summary of the content of your presentation.
  • However, you are not restricted to the use of PowerPoint alone (although remember that this is what you are submitting). Props, singing, dancing, audience involvement, photo stories etc can all be used – feel free to be creative – but ensure you get your point across.

Your presentation and PowerPoint slides should include the following:

  • A very brief overview/introduction to the proposed research task
  • Clear identification of at least three (3) ethical issues present in the project proposed
  • Clear justifications for the alternative approaches and solution proposed to address each of the identified issue.
Assessment Due Date Week 5 Tuesday (04-Apr-2017) 12:00 PM AEST
Return Date to Students Week 7 Friday (28-Apr-2017)
Assignments will be returned within two weeks of submission
Weighting 15%
Assessment Criteria

Download Written Assessment Task 1 PDF from Moodle site for details and grading matrix.

Referencing Style American Psychological Association (APA)
Submission Hard copy
Group submission

To be presented at Residential School

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

1. Identify and apply the ethical requirements of psychological research in an Australian context, particularly as they relate to the National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Human Research.

2. Critically evaluate research from an ethics perspective and propose changes to a research approach and/or design to address the ethical issues identified.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Communication

2. Problem Solving

3. Critical Thinking

4. Information Literacy

5. Team Work

6. Information Technology Competence

7. Cross Cultural Competence

8. Ethical practice



2 Written Assessment

Assessment Title Written Assessment 1 (Research Ethics)
Task Description

Individual written critique of a research ethics application (20%)

In a logical, well-integrated essay (using APA style referencing and headings) identify (with well-reasoned justification) the major issues of ethical concern in relation to the application assigned to your group, and how these might be rectified. The issue/s you identify should be consistent with the approach taken in your group presentation. Your individual submission can focus on only one point, and can also address points in addition to your group presentation. It is expected however that will be a degree of overlap between the group submission and your individual submission. It is important to note here that you are expected to apply ethical concepts within the context of the ethics application assigned to your group and not write an essay about a particular ethical concept/s more generally.

Using the same approach as Task 1 and the group work presentation, your essay must:

  • Clearly identify each ethical issue and explain why it is of ethical concern (with appropriate empirical justification provided).
  • Clearly outline, and provide justifications for any alternatives to the proposed approach and how these might lead to better ethical conduct of this specific research project (again with reference to both the NHRMC guidelines and the provision of other empirical evidence to justify your assertions and propositions)
  • Be formatted according to APA Style Requirements
  • Have a correctly formatted Title Page
  • Have an abstract which summarises the essay
  • Have a correctly formatted reference list
  • Be between 1250 and 1500 words (count does NOT include title page, abstract or reference lists. Count DOES include in-text citations).
  • Submissions in excess of the 1500 word maximum will be penalised 10% of the total possible grade and assessment will only occur on the text of the assignment up to the 1500 words.
  • Submissions below the 1250 word minimum will not be assessed and the student will receive an F grade and 0% for this assessment piece.

Follow a similar approach to your group presentation and ensure that each of the following aspects are addressed for each issue you identify:

  • Problem identification (i.e. what is the issue?)
  • Articulation of WHY that particular aspect a problem (with reference to empirical sources)
  • Proposal of an appropriate solution
  • Clear justification (with reference to empirical sources) of WHY the proposed solution is appropriate
  • Clear justification (with reference to empirical sources) of WHY and HOW the proposed solution will solve the problem identified.
Assessment Due Date Week 6 Tuesday (18-Apr-2017) 05:00 PM AEST
Return Date to Students Week 8 Friday (05-May-2017)
Assignments will be returned within two weeks of submission
Weighting 20%
Assessment Criteria

Download Written Assessment Task 2 PDF from Moodle site for details and grading matrix.

Referencing Style American Psychological Association (APA)
Submission Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

1. Identify and apply the ethical requirements of psychological research in an Australian context, particularly as they relate to the National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Human Research.

2. Critically evaluate research from an ethics perspective and propose changes to a research approach and/or design to address the ethical issues identified.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Communication

2. Problem Solving

3. Critical Thinking

4. Information Literacy

6. Information Technology Competence

7. Cross Cultural Competence

8. Ethical practice



3 Practical Assessment

Assessment Title Practical Assessment (Professional Ethics)
Task Description

Select a professional ethical dilemma that may be faced by a practicing psychologist.

Prepare a brief 15 minute presentation which includes:

  • A brief description of the ethical dilemma.
  • Identification of the factors involved in the dilemma.
  • Use of the APS decision making model as a guide to resolve the dilemma.
Assessment Due Date Week 5 Wednesday (05-Apr-2017) 12:00 PM AEST
To be presented at Residential School
Return Date to Students Week 7 Friday (28-Apr-2017)
Assignments will be returned within two weeks of submission
Weighting 15%
Assessment Criteria

Presentations will be peer-assessed. Please download Assessment Task 3 from the Moodle site for more details and the marking matrix.

Referencing Style American Psychological Association (APA)
Submission Hard copy

To be presented at Residential School

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

3. Apply and evaluate ethical decision making strategies across multiple professional contexts, particularly as they relate to applications of the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Gudelines of the Australian Psychological Society.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Communication

2. Problem Solving

3. Critical Thinking

4. Information Literacy

5. Team Work

6. Information Technology Competence

7. Cross Cultural Competence

8. Ethical practice



4 Written Assessment

Assessment Title Written Assessment (Professional Ethics)
Task Description

Individual Essay: Professional Practice Dilemma (20%)

Following the residential school four (4) professional ethical dilemmas will be made available on Moodle. You are to choose one of these dilemmas and apply the APS ethical decision model discussed during the residential school.

Essay length is 1250-1500 words.

The essay may address the following points:

Problem Recognition

  • Does the response clearly identify the ethical dilemma?
  • Does the response clearly explain the ethical dilemma? (This should be described as a conflict between competing duties where either good or right may be involved. E.g. The situation represents a conflict between duty to do X and duty to do Y)
  • Are principles or situations that have been emphasised in professional training relevant? If so, are these identified?
  • Is this a choice which over-arches the individual’s interests?
  • Who is involved in this situation for whom are the consequences relevant?
  • Who are the people affected and to whom are duties owed?
  • Is human wellbeing threatened (not just the client)?
  • Are rights or duties, including duty of care, salient?
  • Are cultural issues salient?
  • Which meta-ethical assumptions does the individual bring to this situation?

Antecedents and parameters of the dilemma

  • What previous examples can assist in understanding the situation?
  • What duties or responsibilities are present in the situation, including rights and duties derived from law or professional codes?
  • Which norms and values are implicit in the situation including norms expressed through law or professional codes?
  • What additional information might the psychologist need in order to specify and clarify alternative actions?
  • With whom should the psychologist consult?

Identify and evaluate alternative plans of action

  • What are the possible consequences of each alternative (for a full analysis consider: what is the probability, intensity, immediacy, proximity and extent of each?)
  • What rights are upheld and or duties discharged in each alternative? Ignored in each alternative?
  • How well does each action reflect relevant cultural norms and my personal values?
  • Which actions would model those of an ideal psychologist
  • Are there any pressures influencing the psychologist’s decision?

Selection of Action

  • Which action maximises the wellbeing of the client in this situation?
  • Which action corresponds to the psychologist’s primary duty?
  • Which alternative corresponds to the moist strongly held norm or best reflects the requirements of legislation and/ or ethical codes?
  • Which alternative best corresponds to that done in the matching case or by an ideal figure?
  • Which response best reflects the personal values of the psychologist?

Summary and conclusion

  • Overall which course of action can best be defended on the basis of ethical considerations?
  • Are there possible constraints when implementing this decision?
  • What might be the adverse circumstances arising from this decision?
  • How might these adverse circumstances be managed?

Formatting and word length

  • Be formatted according to APA Style Requirements
  • Have a correctly formatted Title Page
  • Have an abstract which summarises the essay
  • Have a correctly formatted reference list
  • Be between 1250 and 1500 words (count does NOT include title page, abstract or reference lists. Count DOES include in-text citations).
  • Submissions in excess of the 1500 word maximum will be penalised 10% of the total possible grade and assessment will only occur on the text of the assignment up to the 1500 words.
  • Submissions below the 1250 word minimum will not be assessed and the student will receive an F grade and 0% for this assessment piece.
Assessment Due Date Week 9 Friday (12-May-2017) 05:00 PM AEST
Return Date to Students Week 11 Friday (26-May-2017)
Assignments will be returned within two weeks of submission
Weighting 20%
Assessment Criteria

Please download Assessment Task 4 from the Moodle site for more details and the marking matrix

Content of the essay (10%) including:

  • Identification of relevant ethical issues.
  • Explanation of relevant ethical issues.
  • Detailed explanation of possible implications from these issues.
  • Review and integration of valid and current research.
  • Referral to relevant sections of the APS Code of Ethics and the APS ethical decision model.

Structure and style of the essay (8%)

  • Demonstration of high level critical thinking.
  • Demonstration of high level analytical skills.
  • Logical argument.
  • Definite conclusions (clear stance).
  • Appropriate language and style for a professional / academic audience.
  • Good sentence structure, spelling, punctuation and grammar.

Format and layout (2%)

  • Accuracy of in-text citations.
  • Appropriate use of in-text citations.
  • Correct APA formatting for in-text citations and reference list.
  • Overall adherence to APA requirements
Referencing Style American Psychological Association (APA)
Submission Hard copy

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

2. Critically evaluate research from an ethics perspective and propose changes to a research approach and/or design to address the ethical issues identified.

3. Apply and evaluate ethical decision making strategies across multiple professional contexts, particularly as they relate to applications of the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Gudelines of the Australian Psychological Society.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Communication

2. Problem Solving

3. Critical Thinking

4. Information Literacy

6. Information Technology Competence

7. Cross Cultural Competence

8. Ethical practice



Examination

Outline Complete an examination
Date During the University examination period
Weighting 30%
Length 180 minutes
Details Dictionary - non-electronic, concise, direct translation only (dictionary must not contain any notes or comments).
No Calculators Permitted
Closed Book
Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

1. Identify and apply the ethical requirements of psychological research in an Australian context, particularly as they relate to the National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Human Research.

3. Apply and evaluate ethical decision making strategies across multiple professional contexts, particularly as they relate to applications of the Code of Ethics and the Ethical Gudelines of the Australian Psychological Society.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Communication

2. Problem Solving

3. Critical Thinking

7. Cross Cultural Competence

8. Ethical practice


© 2017 CQUniversity
Page generated by apps-prod-02.cqu.edu.au at Fri Mar 31 08:39:49 AEST 2017