PPMP20008 - Initiating and Planning Projects
Term 1 - 2017


All details in this unit profile for PPMP20008 have been officially approved by CQUniversity and represent a learning partnership between the University and you (our student). The information will not be changed unless absolutely necessary and any change will be clearly indicated by an approved correction included in the profile.

Overview

This unit is designed for project managers to develop their skills in the initiating and planning stages of the project life cycle. The unit considers several different definitions of what is required when planning a project from the perspective of different standards, frameworks and academic works. Additionally, the unit investigates projects according to industry, project domain, and other factors that influence approaches to initiation and planning. The content of inputs and outputs required and the tools and techniques applied are studied throughout the unit. A highlight of the unit is the practical use of project estimates, work breakdown structures and work packets, as well as the development of a project charter, stakeholder registers and plans. This unit will be of interest to students that have a requirement to know more about project justification, project bidding, project contracts, estimating, planning and scheduling. Students will learn how to apply some of the project management procedures and processes in practical situations as well as developing some expertise in the use of project management software.

Details

Career Level Postgraduate
Credit Points 6
Student Contribution Band 3A
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.125

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Offerings

Term 1 - 2017
  • Brisbane
  • Distance
  • Mackay
  • Melbourne
  • Perth
  • Sydney

Website

This unit has a website, within the Moodle system, which is available two weeks before the start of term. It is important that you visit your Moodle site throughout the term. Go to Moodle

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Class Timetable

Assessment Overview

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Practical Assessment 20%
2. Practical Assessment 20%
3. Practical Assessment 20%
4. Practical Assessment 20%
5. Presentation and Written Assessment 20%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%). Consult the University’s Grades and Results Procedures for more details of interim results and final grades.

All University policies are available on the IMPortal.

You may wish to view these policies:

  • Grades and Results Procedure
  • Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework)
  • Review of Grade Procedure
  • Academic Misconduct Procedure
  • Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – Domestic Students
  • Monitoring Academic Progress (MAP) Policy and Procedure – International Students
  • Refund and Excess Payments (Credit Balances) Policy and Procedure
  • Student Feedback – Compliments and Complaints Policy and Procedure
  • Acceptable Use of Information and Communications Technology Facilities and Devices Policy and Procedure

This list is not an exhaustive list of all University policies. The full list of University policies are available on the IMPortal.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Feedback Source Recommendation
Course Content Student evaluations, discussion with students, discussion with teaching team, self reflection. No change required. Student feedback highlighted the practical nature of content. Students who were working in industry noted the expansion of their understanding and how the content assisted them in practice.
Assessment Student evaluations, discussion with students, discussion with teaching team, self reflection. Students commented on the highly practical nature of the assessment in this course and that it tested understanding of the important concepts. A number of students were concerned with the amount of work required for the assessments in this subject. This was reflected in previous terms with a number of actions implemented in an attempt to address this. It is recommended that assessment five (the presentation) be removed. Further that assessment four, which is large be due in week 12. This will enable students to engage in the assessment they view as being practical and valuable, in greater depth with a continued emphasis on quality.
Course Website Student evaluations, discussion with students, discussion with teaching team, self reflection. No change required. Students indicated that the course structure was very logical, with supporting documentation and resources attached to the weekly learning sections.
On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:
  1. Describe and discuss differing perspectives for project management life cycles within the initiating and planning projects life cycle phases.
  2. Explain how organisational forms and stakeholder strategies might impact upon business case development and verification of business cases when the planning of projects is undertaken.
  3. Critically analyse contractual arrangements that are used within project management domains.
  4. Develop a project charter and stakeholder register for supplied case studies.
  5. Develop project time, cost, resources and risk estimates for supplied case studies.
  6. Develop project work breakdown structures, WBS dictionaries and compose work packets for supplied case studies.
  7. Develop a project management plan and project sub-plans for supplied case studies.

This unit will satisfy one of the requirements for Australia Computer Society (ACS) accreditation in the postgraduate ICT course s.

The unit also contributes to the required number of academic study units for students wishing to undertake profession certification with the Project Management Institute's (PMI) professional qualifications, such as CAPM or PMP.

The ACS recognises the Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA). SFIA is in use in over 100 countries and provides a widely used and consistent definition of ICT skills. SFIA is increasingly being used when developing job descriptions and role profiles. ACS members can use the tool MySFIA to build a skills profile at https://www.acs.org.au/professionalrecognition/mysfia-b2c.html

This unit contributes to the following workplace skills codes as defined by SFIA:

  • Business Analysis (BUAN),
  • Project Management (PRMG),
  • Stakeholder Relationship Management (RLMT),
  • Systems Integration (SINT),
  • Change Management (CHMG),
  • Release and Deployment (RELM),
  • IT Operations (ITOP),
  • Problem Management (PBMG).

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 - Practical Assessment            
2 - Practical Assessment            
3 - Practical Assessment            
4 - Practical Assessment            
5 - Presentation and Written Assessment        

Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes

  • Professional Level
  • Advanced Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Knowledge        
2. Communication        
3. Cognitive, technical and creative skills
4. Research  
5. Self-management  
6. Ethical and Professional Responsibility          
7. Leadership              

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes

  • Professional Level
  • Advanced Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 - Practical Assessment    
2 - Practical Assessment    
3 - Practical Assessment    
4 - Practical Assessment    
5 - Presentation and Written Assessment

Prescribed Textbooks

A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)
Author/s: PMI Year: 2013
Edition: 5th Publisher: PMI
City: Newtown Square State: Pennsylvania
Country: USA
Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2
Author/s: OGC/AXLEOS Year: 2009
Edition: 2009 Publisher: TSO (The Stationery Office)
City: Norwich
Country: UK
View textbooks at the CQUniversity Bookshop
Note:
  1. An eBook version of A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) is available through CQU Library. Please follow the instructions posted on the Moodle web site to set up an account and download the eBook via CQUniversity Library.
  2. An eBook version of Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2 is available through the TSO Shop UK. Please follow the link http://www.tsoshop.co.uk/bookstore.asp?FO=1162740#GEMS6473576 to purchase a copy. However, if paper copies are preferred, limited copies will be available at the CQUni Bookshop here.

IT Resources

You will need access to the following IT resources:
  • Internet
  • CQUniversity Student Email
  • Unit Website (Moodle)
All submissions for this unit must use the Harvard (author-date) referencing style (details can be obtained here). For further information, see the Assessment Tasks below.
Unit CoordinatorNatalie Ewin (n.ewin@cqu.edu.au)
Note: Check the Term-Specific section for any additional contact information provided by the teaching team
Week Begin Date Module/Topic Chapter Events and Submissions
Week 1 06-03-2017

The application of project management within different project domains.

PMBOK Chapter 1

PRINCE2 Chapters 1 & 2

Tutorial 1.

Lecture 1.

Week 2 13-03-2017

Life Cycles, organisational structures, gates, project boards and stakeholders

PMBOK Chapter 2, 13

PRINCE2 Chapter 3

Tutorial 2.

Lecture 2.

Week 3 20-03-2017

Project processes

PMBOK Chapter 3.1-3.4, 4.1-4.2

PRINCE2 Chapter 5, 12

Tutorial 3.

Lecture 3.

Week 4 27-03-2017

Cost & human resource management

PMBOK Chapter 9.1, 10.1

Prince2 Chapter 14

Tutorial 4.

Lecture 4.

Assessment 1

Project Charter Due Friday (31 Mar 17) 11:45 PM AEST
Week 5 03-04-2017

Scope and schedule

PMBOK Chapter 5, 6.1-6.2

Prince 2 A.26

Tutorial 5.

Lecture 5.

Vacation Week 10-04-2017
Week 6 17-04-2017

Risk Management

PMBOK Chapter 7

Prince2 Chapter 8

Tutorial 6.

Lecture 6.

Assessment 2

Scope, schedule, stakeholders Due Friday (21 Apr 17) 11:45 PM AEST
Week 7 24-04-2017

Quality Management

Process Improvement

PMBOK Chapter 8

PRINCE2 Chapter 6

Tutorial 7.

Lecture 7.

Week 8 01-05-2017 Procurement management

PMBOK Chapter 12.1

PRINCE2 Chapter A.4, A.22

Tutorial 8.

Lecture 8.

Assessment 3

Requirements, Quality and Cost Due Friday (05 May 17) 11:45 PM AEST
Week 9 08-05-2017

The Project Management Plan

PMBOK Chapter 4.2

PRINCE2 Chapter A.16

Tutorial 8.

Lecture 9.

Week 10 15-05-2017

Business case

Contracts

Presenting

PMBOK Chapter 12.1

PRINCE2 Chapter 4

Tutorial 10.

Lecture 10.

Assessment 4

Risk Register Due Friday (19 May 17) 05:00 PM AEST
Week 11 22-05-2017

Lessons Learnt

Reflection

PMBOK Chapter - sections on 'lessons learned'

Prince2 Chapter 18.4.4

Tutorial 11.

Lecture 11.

Week 12 29-05-2017

Presentations

Please note on campus students will present during class on week 12. PowerPoint slides must be submitted prior to presenting.

Distance students will submit PowerPoint Slides with notes/script in place of presenting.

Reflections and lessons learnt presentation - 15 Due Friday (02 Jun 17) 05:00 PM AEST
Review/Exam Week 05-06-2017
Exam Week 12-06-2017

There is no exam for this subject

1 Practical Assessment

Assessment Title Project Charter
Task Description

Assignment Overview

This assessment item requires you to develop a project charter for the project described in a selected tender.

Tenders will be supplied for a range of project domains:-

  • Engineering and construction domain,
  • IT Telecoms Software domain,
  • Financial and business services domain,
  • Welfare domain.

Purpose

This assessment item is to assist you to develop skills in and understand the contents and compilation of the project charter and component parts.

The assignment will also give you the opportunity to enhance your analysis and written communication skills; particularly in the areas of rigorous structured assignment writing.

Assessment Due Date Week 4 Friday (31-Mar-2017) 11:45 PM AEST
Return Date to Students Week 5 Friday (07-Apr-2017)
Weighting 20%
Assessment Criteria

You will be assessed on the appropriate application of the following project management concepts in the development of a project charter for the project described in the selected tender. This assessment is worth 20% of your final grade for the subject, with a total of 20 marks, each mark is equivalent to 1% of the final grade.

1. Project Description (1 mark)

2. Project justification/investment appraisal (1 mark)

3. Project objectives and associated measures (2 marks)

4. High-level requirements (0.5 marks)

5. Assumptions and constraints (1 mark)

6. High-level risks (3 marks)

7. Summary milestone schedule (1 mark)

8. Summary budget (1 mark)

9. Stakeholder list (3 marks)

10. Proposed project lifecycle - waterfall or agile (1 mark)

11. Project approvals requirements (1.5 marks)

12. Assigned project manager (0.5 marks)

13. Structure of the project board (as per Prince2) authorising the project charter. (1.5 marks)

14. Clarity of expression, format, grammar, spelling and referencing. (2 marks)

Note:
Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for
0 (zero) marks where relevant.

Referencing Style Harvard (author-date)
Submission Online

To be submitted as Microsoft Word file.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

4. Develop a project charter and stakeholder register for supplied case studies.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Knowledge

2. Communication

3. Cognitive, technical and creative skills

4. Research

5. Self-management



2 Practical Assessment

Assessment Title Scope, schedule, stakeholders
Task Description

Assignment Overview

This assessment item requires you to develop the following

  1. Scope baseline as described in PMBoK (5 marks)
  2. Work package (a single example) as described in Prince2 (5 marks)
  3. Schedule baseline (5 marks)
  4. Stakeholder register (5 marks)

Case studies will be supplied for a range of project domains:-

  • Engineering and construction domain,
  • IT Telecoms Software domain,
  • Financial and business services domain,
  • Government / Human Services domain.

The submission must comply with the requirements outlined in the PMBOK v5 and PRINCE2 (2009).

Note:

The primary purpose of this assessment item is to assist you to develop skills and an understanding of scope baselines, work packages, schedule baseline and the stakeholder register. The assignment will also give you the opportunity to enhance your analysis and written communication skills; particularly in the areas of structured assignment writing.

You are to develop and complete the documents as the project manager for the project described in your case. Do not simply describe the purpose of the documents.

Group/s

This assessment may be done in groups of up to four students. You must stay in the group for all group assessments and will utilise the same tender. If there are any issues with group members not contributing then they may be asked to leave the group and work on the remaining assessments individually. Flex students can work individually or form groups through the forum on the Moodle site.

Assessment Due Date Week 6 Friday (21-Apr-2017) 11:45 PM AEST
Return Date to Students Week 8 Monday (01-May-2017)
Weighting 20%
Assessment Criteria

Your assignment will be assessed on the extent and quality it meets each of the following criteria.

  1. The project management concepts within the scope baseline are correctly applied and the scope baseline is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender (5 marks)
  2. The project management concepts within the work package are correctly applied and the work package is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender. (5 marks)
  3. The project management concepts within the schedule baseline are correctly applied and the schedule baseline is an accurate refection of the project described in the selected tender (5marks)
  4. The concepts within the stakeholder register are correctly applied and the stakeholder register is an accurate reflection of the case study (5 marks)

Ensure your submissions are submitted in an appropriate format, are concise, demonstrate clarity of expression, correct grammar and spelling.

Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.

Referencing Style Harvard (author-date)
Submission Online

To be submitted as Microsoft Word documents

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

6. Develop project work breakdown structures, WBS dictionaries and compose work packets for supplied case studies.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Knowledge

2. Communication

3. Cognitive, technical and creative skills

4. Research

5. Self-management



3 Practical Assessment

Assessment Title Requirements, Quality and Cost
Task Description

Assignment Overview

This assessment item requires you to develop :-

  • requirements management plan,
  • quality management plan,
  • cost management plan,
  • cost baseline and funding requirements,

…you must then develop the items listed above for a selected case study. The case studies will cover a number of project domains:-

  • Engineering and construction domain,
  • IT Telecoms Software domain,
  • Financial and business services domain,
  • Welfare domain.

Your submissions must meet the minimum requirement outlined in the PMBOK (2013) and conform to the requirements outlined PRINCE2 (2009).

Task

Your task is to consider the overview above and develop and complete the required items. You will be graded upon how well your submissions have been completed and reflect the case studies.

Purpose

This assessment item is to assist you to understand and develop skills in the contents and compilation of project requirements, quality and cost management.

The assignment will also give you the opportunity to enhance your analysis and written communication skills; particularly in the areas of structured assignment writing.

Group/s

This assessment may be done in groups of up to four students. You must stay in the group for all group assessments and will utilise the same tender. If there are any issues with group members not contributing then they may be asked to leave the group and work on the remaining assessments individually. Flex students can work individually or form groups through the forum on the Moodle site.

Assessment Due Date Week 8 Friday (05-May-2017) 11:45 PM AEST
Return Date to Students Week 10 Monday (15-May-2017)
Weighting 20%
Assessment Criteria

Your assignment will be assessed on the extent and quality to which it meets each of the following criteria.

  1. The project management concepts within the requirements management plan are applied appropriately and the requirements management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender (5 marks)
  2. The project management concepts within the quality management plan are applied appropriately and the quality management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender (5 marks)
  3. The project management concepts within the cost management plan are applied appropriately and the cost management plan is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender is complete and reflects the case (5 marks)
  4. The project management concepts within the cost baseline are applied appropriately and the cost baseline is an accurate reflection of the project described in the selected tender is complete and reflects the case (5 marks)

Ensure your submissions are submitted in an appropriate format, are concise, demonstrate clarity of expression, correct grammar and spelling.

Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.

Referencing Style Harvard (author-date)
Submission Online

To be submitted as Microsoft Word and Excel document files

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

5. Develop project time, cost, resources and risk estimates for supplied case studies.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Knowledge

2. Communication

3. Cognitive, technical and creative skills

4. Research

5. Self-management



4 Practical Assessment

Assessment Title Risk Register
Task Description

Assignment Overview

This assessment item requires you to develop a risk register for the project outlined in the selected tender. The tenders will be supplied for a range of project domains:-

  • Engineering and construction domain,
  • IT Telecoms Software domain,
  • Financial and business services domain,
  • Welfare domain.

The submission must meet the minimum requirement outlined in the PMBOK (2013) and PRINCE2 (2009).

You will be graded upon how well your submission has been completed and reflects the case studies.

Purpose

The primary purpose of this assessment item is to help you to understand and develop skills in project risk management.

The assignment will also give you the opportunity to enhance your analysis and written communication skills.

Assessment Due Date Week 10 Friday (19-May-2017) 05:00 PM AEST
Return Date to Students Week 12 Monday (29-May-2017)
Weighting 20%
Assessment Criteria

You will be assessed based on the following criteria. It is important that your assessment is submitted in an appropriate format, that it is concise, demonstrates clarity of expression, correct grammar and spelling; these aspects are incorporated into the allocated marks for this assessment.

1. Seven threats (negative risks) reflective of the project described in the selected tender are identified, analysed and entered appropriately on the risk register. (14 marks)

2. Three opportunities (positive risks) that are reflective of the project described in the selected tender are identified, analysed and entered appropriately on the risk register. (6 marks)

Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.

Referencing Style Harvard (author-date)
Submission Online

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

7. Develop a project management plan and project sub-plans for supplied case studies.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Knowledge

2. Communication

3. Cognitive, technical and creative skills

4. Research

5. Self-management



5 Presentation and Written Assessment

Assessment Title Reflections and lessons learnt presentation - 15
Task Description

Assignment Overview

Completion of PPMP20008 is like a project, there are likely things that went well and things that did not. Reflecting on the experience can be just as meaningful as retaining concepts taught.

This assessment item requires you to reflect on your participation in the course, identify lessons learnt, and consider what actions can be taken to address lessons and improve future study projects. Please note these learnings are based on your role as a student in PPMP20008 and not based on the case study.

You will need to determine a framework to base your lessons learnt on. In practice lessons learnt discussions are usually framed in certain ways to illicit learnings from participants. Consider what is the most effective way to do this within the context of your group (Flex - if not in a group - for you as an individual), the course and the experience during the term.

You must develop, submit and present a 15 minute presentation (in Microsoft PowerPoint) discussing your reflection and lessons learnt, to your peers in week 12. You must be prepared to answer questions from unit participants after your presentation.

Flex students will not present, however must submit a written set of presentation notes/script. These notes are to be submitted within the notes section of the PowerPoint slides.

You will be graded based on how well you have made your presentation, the lessons learnt framework developed, the lessons shared, and the actions planned to address lessons for future study.

Purpose

This assessment item is to assists you to reflect on your performance in a project, identify lessons learnt, develop strategies to leverage those lessons and develop presentation skills.

Assessment Due Date Week 12 Friday (02-Jun-2017) 05:00 PM AEST
The presentations will be arranged during week 12.
Return Date to Students Review/Exam Week Friday (09-Jun-2017)
Weighting 20%
Assessment Criteria

Your assignment will be assessed on the extent and quality to which it meets each of the following criteria:-

  1. The framework for identifying lessons learnt would enable a meaningful lessons learnt process and address common issues experienced with lessons learnt in projects. (5 marks)
  2. The lessons identified demonstrated deep reflection about the learning process. (5 marks)
  3. SMART process improvement strategies were identified. (SMART - Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bounded). (5 marks)
  4. A clear flow of thought throughout the presentation with a clear purpose described in the introduction and a comprehensive conclusion. Professional presenting style as if being presented to a project board. For on campus students this will be determined through the presentation, flex via the presentation notes. (5 marks).

Ensure the presentation is appropriately formatted within slide and note/script limit: 10 to 20 slides & notes/script, that there is clarity of expression, correct grammar, spelling and referencing. The presentation should cater for different learning preferences. Try not to read of your notes, this takes practice and confidence in the material being presented.

Note for on campus students - every student in the group must present to be awarded marks in this assessment. If you are unable to attend class during the time you were to present, you must submit a request for extension via Moodle, with supporting documentary evidence such as a doctors certificate. If the extension request is approved, you will then have to arrange another time with your tutor to do the presentation. In such cases, students will need to present the full presentation and will be marked independently of the group.

Assessments provide the opportunity for students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills to achieve the required standard. To do this, assessment responses need to be both clear and easy to understand. If not, the University cannot determine that students have demonstrated their knowledge and skills. Assessments will, therefore, be marked accordingly including the potential for 0 (zero) marks where relevant.

Referencing Style Harvard (author-date)
Submission Online

To be submitted as a PowerPoint document file - 10 to 20 slides.

Learning Outcomes Assessed
This section can be expanded to view the assessed learning outcomes

1. Describe and discuss differing perspectives for project management life cycles within the initiating and planning projects life cycle phases.

2. Explain how organisational forms and stakeholder strategies might impact upon business case development and verification of business cases when the planning of projects is undertaken.

3. Critically analyse contractual arrangements that are used within project management domains.

Graduate Attributes
This section can be expanded to view the assessed graduate attributes

1. Knowledge

2. Communication

3. Cognitive, technical and creative skills

4. Research

5. Self-management

6. Ethical and Professional Responsibility

7. Leadership




© 2017 CQUniversity
Page generated by apps-prod-01.cqu.edu.au at Sun Mar 26 05:33:02 AEST 2017